Minutes
of CRC Meeting
Location: 607 McBryde
Time: 10-11:45 am
Date: 11.16.1999
Attendees: Marc Abrams (CRC), Chris Arnold, Dwight Barnette (CRC), Sandy Birch, Jamie Evans, Daniel Hagan, Gay Meredith, Hussein Suleman (CRC), Srinidhi Varadarajan (CRC)
The meeting began with a discussion on lab use requests when the lab is not open. It was noted that there were prior problems with Dr. Nance’s class in Spring. A suggestion was made to appoint student lab-monitors to oversee access to lab facilities. Students who wish access to the lab would have to sign an access agreement. It was also noted that students of Dr. Nance have not pursued lab access issues since the beginning of this term.
Policy for future use during non-lab hours was discussed. Volunteer monitors from a class would be required to be on duty and check students in and out as well as keep records on station usage.
Motion: Allow access to lab facilities during non lab-hours in the presence of a student lab monitor. Duties of the student lab-monitor are as listed above.
Motion Result: Passed
Vote breakdown (Marc, Dwight, Srinidhi, Hussein)
The next item tackled at the meeting was the breakup of SCHEV funding for the year among the suggested categories. The following points were noted:
Breakdown of SCHEV funding
The meeting also discussed the possible replacement of vtopus using current SCHEV funds. The migration would require some overlap when both vtopus and its replacement are concurrently active. No decision was made in this regard, but it was noted that SCHEV funds might not be available for this purpose next year.
It was noted that SCHEV purchase orders to be sent out by Christmas 1999, with all requisitions being cut by Jan 2000.
The meeting discusses the possible replacement of DEC Alpha computers in the department with Sun Ultra workstations. Email messages from Layne Watson, Cliff Shaffer and Dennis Kafura were discussed. Arguments for continuing with Alphas include (a) They are being used in classes (b) Maintenance is easy, (c) Floating point performance is excellent and (d) The Fortran compiler is better. Arguments against it were (a) It is very pricey, (b) Floating point performance is not needed and (c) Java implementation is far behind on Alpha platforms. Sun Java implementations are initially for the Solaris environment. Bill McQuain noted that a current Java implementation is needed to run the automatic grading system.
The following points were noted:
1. The phase-out decision on Alphas should be thought of as a long term decision.
2. Faculty with Alphas should be consulted in this decision.
3. It was noted that the migration of vtopus from an Alpha to BSD might inspire confidence in the use of alternate platforms.
4. Currently SCHEV funding is available. Faculty could be told that money is available for migration to the Sun platform.
5. Consider smaller number of multiprocessor SUN platforms instead of more Alphas.
a. Pros: Fewer machines to maintain
b. Problems:
i. Single point of failure
ii. No apparent fiscal advantage
iii. No real maintenance advantage
The final decision was to stay with the current Alpha platform.
The following options were presented for the configuration of the recommended machine for incoming freshmen in 2000.
For the dual boot configuration, one of the operating systems should be UNIX. The issue of which variant of UNIX should be used was raised.
Possible manufacturers for the machines are Compaq, Dell and Gateway
It was noted that UPC was involved in the decision in formulating a new UNIX course and UPC might not want pre configured machines. Students need to know the new machine configuration by Feb 2000. Options for continuing the discussion included raising the issue in faculty meeting or talking to faculty at individual meetings.
It was also noted that Gateway has a supply problem since its machines are only supplied through the bookstore.
The issue of suggested UNIX version for the dual boot configuration was discussed. The possible OS choices were FreeBSD or Linux. It was noted that classes currently use BSD and there is a difference in the system call interface between the two operating systems.
Secondly, the dual boot configuration may not be recommended for the following reasons.
CRC Motion: Recommend a dual boot Linux configuration option for incoming 2000-2001 freshmen.
Motion Result: Failed. It was decided not to recommend a dual boot configuration
Vote Breakdown: 2 against motion, 1 for motion, 1 abstention, 1 representative absent.
The following issues discussed regarding migration to the new multiprocessor Sun platform currently located in Daniel Hagan’s office
The meeting decided to create accounts on the new Sun Enterprise on an on-demand basis. The student representative Hussein Suleman will advertise account availability to graduate students.
It was decided to maintain the same hard disk quotas for accounts on the new machine as the existing csgrad. 50 MB soft quota and 100MB hard limit.